Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
**** Yes im saying the permission cant be withdrawn because the consequences are known.
Yes the consequences are known that’s why she’s aborting with full knowledge of the why’s , you have no right to interfere
**** I consider it like a verbal contract, if you entered into a bad agreement that is your fault.
But it’s nothing like a verbal contract if I give you permission say as a homeless person to stay in my house can I not withdraw that permission?
****I deny her choice to so something I believe has justification of being extremely immoral.
I don’t believe in the right to bear arms but I get the reason why Americans do it’s all subjective opinions nothing more , I don’t care either way about abortion what I care about is this assumed right that a woman must give birth against her will that’s tyranny
****Back when we had no way to remove tattoos would the woman be able to sue a tattoo artist if she no longer wanted it on her body.
No she wouldn’t because she paid to have a tattoo and no doubt read their terms and conditions beforehand and realized that to take a case she would lose
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: permission cant    verbal contract   homeless person   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
Makes one think that teenagers in Japan talking about the rights of anime characters half-jokingly, perhaps, are not that unhinged, in comparison to what all cultures talk about routinely.
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.52  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: unborn people    humans' fascination   dead people   rights of anime characters  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Im done arguing on the home thing, because i think it is more similar to signing a contract.
Just because it didnt exist doesnt mean the mother didnt consent to it.
Harm and pain are 2 different concepts. There are people that cant feel pain, you can still harm them.
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 70%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 79%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: home thing    different concepts   mother didnt consent   pain  
  Relevant (Beta): 76%  
  Learn More About Debra
Thats fine, but the mothers choice created and now she is killing it. That seems to be the most immoral.
Just like thr tattoo case, the mother knows the terms and conditions of having unprotected sex/ sex in general...you can create a human life.
  Considerate: 47%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: mothers choice    full knowledge of consequences doesnt mean   thr tattoo case   unprotected sex  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
- Who owns the contract, since the fetus was physically incapable of consenting to it
- Why should having sex automatically constitute agreement to this contract
- Why should there be no stipulations present to breach or nullify the contract
Consider this: If the parents hold responsibility for the fetus, then they should own the contract, meaning they hold the decision to breach the contract.Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: parents hold responsibility    contract   fetus   sex  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Why should sex nake you consent. Because the human life being created doesnt have a choice, the parents are the only ones that do.
Because the contract is to protect the life you created, breaching this contract nullifies the ebtire purpose. One cannot just decide to breach a contract...that has legal consequences.
  Considerate: 58%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: human life    fetuds doesnt   ebtire purpose   contract  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra
You realize your body creates life all the time, and likewise it kills life all the time, some of it is your own life that it created itself.
There is no contract which doesn't have legal provisions for breaking that contract. If the person who made the contract or the person who entered into it have a disagreement, they can breach the contract. Since the person making and the person entering are the same due to proxy, then these parties both have the right to do so, i.e. the mother has the right to breach contract if she decides she doesn't want the person in her body, or the mother has the right to breach contract on the fetus's behalf.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: person entering    person   life   US citizen  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.48  
  Sources: 4  
  Relevant (Beta): 17%  
  Learn More About Debra
**** just because you have full knowledge of consequences doesnt mean that decision cant still be bad and immoral.
But bad or immoral is only from your position it’s purely subjective
****Thats fine, but the mothers choice created and now she is killing it. That seems to be the most immoral.
Most immoral ? Not from the woman’s point of view which you don’t consider at all , who do you value the unborn more than th born?
****Just like thr tattoo case, the mother knows the terms and conditions of having unprotected sex/ sex in general...you can create a human life.
You can create a human life yes , but there are no set terms and conditions attached to pregnancy
  Considerate: 51%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.76  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: woman’s point    unprotected sex   full knowledge of consequences doesnt mean   human life  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
The contract based on a verbal agreement alone is simple: "You can do some things to me, and I can do some things to you." That is it. The notion of a potential child does not enter the equation.
In case of conception with no pre-existing contract, there is absolutely no obligation on either party to protect the created life, and it can be terminated at any point with no consequences, up until it becomes an autonomous human being, which does not happen until after the act of giving birth.
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
My body doesnt create and kill human life daily.
They may be able to breach it, but there are consequences for doing so.
  Considerate: 57%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: not.My body doesnt    human life daily.They   citizen   consequences  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
I think the argument you make, the contract analogy and pre-birth personhood, could be used by anti-natalists... How can this be a contract when the baby has no say in the matter? You work under the premise that existence is a choice everyone would make regardless of the conditions of that existence. That if one had the choice to exist or not exist, one should always chose to exist no matter what. I disagree.
How would you handle this hypothetical case... Someone is born with some physical condition that seriously diminish their quality of life, whether it's physical malformation, genetic disease, etc. Now say that this condition was detected early in the pregnancy, that it was known early that the child would have serious limitations and whose existence would be painful, could that person sue their parents for giving birth knowing this?
There is actually someone trying that now in India, he's perfectly healthy though and I don't know about laws in India but I wonder how would the system handle this in America. I doubt any court would accept to actually hear the case but it would be an interesting exercise nonetheless imo... His case should fall because I doubt there is a rational explanation as to how someone could have sought his consent to be born, but it could serve as a platform to demonstrate the immorality of intentional procreation...
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: hypothetical case    physical condition   conditions of that existence   genetic disease  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
I accept your reasoning, but it stops short. After all, I’m sure you would accept a defensive killing of a would-be rapist even though rape isn’t highly correlated with death of the victim. You have set your standard unreasonably high where abortion is concerned. Pregnancy affects body, ability to earn a living, and future. Just like rape, enduring these things without consent is a threat to life even if it may not cause death. Be consistent.
  Considerate: 64%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.74  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: life of mother abortions    severe fetal abnormalities   late term abortions   Special Need's babies  
  Relevant (Beta): 89%  
  Learn More About Debra
There should be set terms and conditions to the pregnancy, that is my point.
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 68%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.82  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: unborn persons life    own volition.There   set terms   conditions  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
***** I value the unborn persons life more than the inconvience she created by her own volition.
But you do not know nor can you know the individual reasons why women abort it’s almost as if those against think they do it as an act of spite or on a whim the opposite most likely is the case
****There should be set terms and conditions to the pregnancy, that is my point.
I would not to live in a country where that was law how would one even word such a document?
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 92%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: act of spite    unborn persons life   individual reasons   own volition.But  
  Relevant (Beta): 75%  
  Learn More About Debra
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 44%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: consequence    contract   fetus    
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
It easy, unless someone told you they dont want to live or exist you assume they want to and let them make the decision later.
If someone doesnt have a do not resuscitate signature, and theyre in a bad wreck, you dont let them die because later on the hardships may make them wish they were dead.
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.36  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: decision later.If    bad wreck   choice   signature  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
The baby doesnt have much autonomous action either. A baby inside the womb reacts to sounds, ect.
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 53%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 82%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: notion of a potential child doesnt    part of the equation.The baby doesnt   much autonomous action   equation  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
But would someone be able to make a case in court against their parents for giving them birth?
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.42  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: case    court   parents   birth  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
How would you word such a document. You are required to take care of your offspring from conception until adulthood, unless a doctor finds that it creates a health hazard to the mother.
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: doctor finds    care of your offspring   health hazard   reasons  
  Relevant (Beta): 83%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 14%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 50%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.74  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Which makes zero since because when someone breaches a contract they are the ones that recieve the penalty not the opposing party.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.48  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: opposing party    contract   @Happy_Killbot   penalty  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 22%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 43%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.6  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: MichaelElpers         
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
****The reasons for most women because there stats on why they do
****How would you word such a document. You are required to take care of your offspring from conception until adulthood, unless a doctor finds that it creates a health hazard to the mother.
  Considerate: 66%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.94  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 58%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 81%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: person explicity    nbsp      
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 58%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 81%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: person explicity    nbsp      
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
I have heard quite a few times people saying something along the lines of, "I wish I had never been born". I think it is a terrible outlook on life that indicates some deep psychological issues, but nonetheless such a position is held by some people. Some people even commit suicide, in order to undo the actions of their parents.
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.8  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Of course, but by the same, why should we assume someone wants to live?
I'm asking, if someone sued their parent for giving them birth knowing early in the pregnancy, that there was a serious medical condition present, what would be the grounds for refusing to even hear the case, if any?
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 60%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: die.Of course    serious medical condition present   parent   pregnancy  
  Relevant (Beta): 82%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 64%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: innocent unborn babies    actual innocent people   viable baby   valid reason  
  Relevant (Beta): 45%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.28  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: possibility of malpractice    point   different animal   validity  
  Relevant (Beta): 74%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 42%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: option    people   nbsp    
  Relevant (Beta): 74%  
  Learn More About Debra
Why are you evading my question?
If someone sued their parent for giving them birth knowing early in the pregnancy, that there was a serious medical condition present, what would be the grounds for refusing to even hear the case, if any?
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 59%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: serious medical condition present    question   pregnancy   parent  
  Relevant (Beta): 39%  
  Learn More About Debra
First, there are more possible states for a given person than "this person wants to live" and "this person wants to be dead". There is an infinity of points in between, such as "this person is impartial towards living/dying", or "this person overall wants to live, but would not particularly mind being dead either".
Second, what the person wants and what they can get are two different things. Someone wanting something does not magically give them the privilege to have that something.
Third, a person who has not even been born yet cannot "want" anything. "Wants" emerge at a much later stage.
Finally, why is assuming that someone wants to be dead ridiculous? There are people who want to be dead, and you cannot prove that a given person (let alone, a being who is not a person yet) does not want to be dead without actually looking at how they are going to act.
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
And considering the suicide rates (assisted or not), I don't think it's that ridiculous to consider the option...
  Considerate: 57%  
  Substantial: 45%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.36  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: suicide rates    option   nbsp    
  Relevant (Beta): 54%  
  Learn More About Debra
@MayCaesar What exactly are you concluding by making this claim here?
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: innocent bacteria    whole point of whose lives   altruistic beings   different living  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra
Roe Vs Wade found abortion legislation in Texas to be unconstitutional as the wrong was found to be a cause of a breech of privacy and trust, then the legislation was documented as having broken all woman's basic medical right to privacy and trust. The united state that acts on all woman as creator is their ovulation and the introduction of human embryo, egg. The use of lethal force by a woman in relationship with birth may not require the same legal requirements that a Capital Punishments' from crime require.
A person who is not the mother, and is other then the father has no powers of emancipation of a minor at this stage, the fathers powers of emancipation are in truth greatly limited, the Nations powers of emancipation of minor are very limited. What was not limited by neglect? At this point it may be vital to examine if the law makers behind this legislation had been state licensed lawyers. As it does not take a medical doctor to identify the malpractice pointed out in Roe Vs Wade.
Keep in mind a common defense to the general welfares by constitutional separations made by order of American United States Constitution is female specific amputation.
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: woman's basic medical right    medical doctor   united state   Roe Vs Wade  
  Relevant (Beta): 82%  
  Learn More About Debra
Because the only other option is to assume people want to be dead, and everyone knows that is ridiculous .
No MichaelElpers abolishing pregnancy abortion as it had been found to be a cause to a violation of privacy over 50 years ago is on the table. The creator in your state of the union address is lethal force not death, and it is without prejudice, nor is it ridiculous to believe any woman may find a greater necessity to apply a lethal force in this matter over other woman.
Do to the inability to declare female constitutional right in this matter I must ask. Do I make my self clear?
  Considerate: 59%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.46  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: lethal force    state of the union address   greater necessity   creator  
  Relevant (Beta): 86%  
  Learn More About Debra
People know when we are right or wrong, and we both know who is wasting our time with ludicrous analogies.
That drunk driver NEVER gets the death penalty you support for all innocent unborn aborted babies.
The death penalty that you support, for a so called intruder who never asked to intrude, is truly barbaric!@Happy_Killbot
  Considerate: 45%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: death penalty    drunk driver   ludicrous analogies.That   Debra  
  Relevant (Beta): 61%  
  Learn More About Debra
@John_C_87 there's a web-based app called Grammarly which might be of great help to you. In addition to that remembering that if scientific geniuses can make complex things sound simple and speak in laymen terms then you should ideally have no trouble doing the same. Unless, of course, you're using an argument from gibberish to avoid having to engage any discussions that actually oppose your arguments and/or make you feel uncomfortable. The argument from gibberish is not a win on your part by the way; it's actually a failure on your part.
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: woman's basic medical right    use of lethal force   medical doctor   Roe Vs Wade  
  Relevant (Beta): 57%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 60%  
  Substantial: 57%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: suicide    nbsp      
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
You can get the death penalty if you are in El Salvador:
https://www.lifesafer.com/blog/drinking-driving-outside-us/
I'm not supporting the death penalty, I'm supporting removal by force. You can do something about intruders in your home, and if they happen to die as soon as they are outside?
Not your problem.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 50%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.42  
  Sources: 3  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: death penalty    low self esteem   drunk driver   ludicrous analogies.That  
  Relevant (Beta): 71%  
  Learn More About Debra
Why do you assume that death is what they want, from the fact that they would sue their parents for giving them birth?? Couldn't admission of wrongdoing and maybe compensation be enough?
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 66%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: admission of wrongdoing    death   fact   parents  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
The point is your off the question raised by Roe Vs Wade ruling, the description focus is on Texas legislation not pregnancy's abortion as a state found legal or criminal. This is with the word abortion and written law directly. My argument isn't gibberish it is unexpected, unprepared for, and on target of the ruling made in 1976 as it does not fit the limitation set with any legal malpractice, gibberish that is just an excuse.
Is female specific amputation abortion?
If so, prove it? Please.
Is female specific amputation a legal malpractice if so provide a United state Constitutional common defense? Please.
The simplest question to ask any medical doctor or lawyer of when life begins is easy. What came first the human fertilized egg or the human egg? Which do you believe cam first?
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.34  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: female specific amputation abortion    Roe Vs Wade   medical doctor   legal malpractice  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
Keep in mind it is without doubt both Plaffelvohfen and Happy_Killbot support a prejudice to continue between woman. You are being directed off topic. All woman are to be created equal by their creator.
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 70%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.02  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Killbot support    suicide   mind   woman  
  Relevant (Beta): 73%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 46%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: person    woman   thier creator   prejudice  
  Relevant (Beta): 64%  
  Learn More About Debra
...or any other pro-life advocate:
If either of you guys are interested in a formal debate, I would be willing to view the unborn as persons and argue pro-choice. I think your position discounts the rights of women and human rights in general, and personhood is ultimately irrelevant to my argumentation. I prefer to debate at debateart and need longer round time limits since I work a lot. Let me know - I would love to give it a go.
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: pro-life advocate    formal debate   human rights   rights of women  
  Relevant (Beta): 62%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 39%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 73%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Im    account   thats   debating  
  Relevant (Beta): 36%  
  Learn More About Debra
We are not the ones trying to kill a woman of personhood. You are the one discounting the rights of a living unborn baby, even when the baby is viable! There is no need to continue a conversation with someone so blatantly one sided on the issue.
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: unborn baby    rights of a living   woman of personhood   conversation  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.72  
  Sources: 4  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: bunch of words    basic English Grammar   native language   argument  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
So yes, you are the one, and guess what else ? You are not the only one ? Who is forced to accursing a minor of murder ? You asking that a minor be emancipated the released to your care? Female specific amputation would describe the removal of a minor can be made on your behalf of any woman. Unlike the accusation of incompetency shown by some with the desire to self-incriminate others, supporting prejudice between woman for what ever reason. It is your action, and your action alone, by female specific ampuation that would grant the ordering for any woman to turn over the minor to your care, immediately apron the legal intervention of your emancipation.
Obviously you can give birth better then many other woman and this is why with abuses set in licensed medical practice you work so hard to emancipator the minor into your care? Even though you know medical advancements, procedures had not advance enough to insure that life of the minor when transplanted by your request? Be careful in what is asked form impartial support of interpretations on emancipation of minors from parent you might just receive it.
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.28  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: woman of personhood    action   pregnant woman   woman's person desire  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra